MotoTrbo Vs. Astro

Moderator: Queue Moderator

Post Reply
radio_rob_nj
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 12:28 am
What radios do you own?: Motorola, ICOM, Harris, Tait

MotoTrbo Vs. Astro

Post by radio_rob_nj »

I know almost nothing about Mototrbo, so with that, can a MotoTrbo radio be used on a Type II trunking system (in analog or digital mode)? I assume that MotoTrbo is not compatible with Astro, but can you flash the radio/does the radio ship with the H38 Smartzone feature?
I'll see your 4.1 and raise you a 7.13
User avatar
Tom in D.C.
Posts: 3859
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2001 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: Progreso soup can with CRT

Re: MotoTrbo Vs. Astro

Post by Tom in D.C. »

The MotoTrbo is a CDMA digital radio that operates on two adjacent
6.25 kHz channels simultaneously. It has nothing in common with
IMBE/P25 setups. It is also specifically not recommended fby Motorola
for public service work. Do a search on this Board for more information
on the subject; there's a lot of it here.
Tom in D.C.
In 1920, the U.S. Post Office Department ruled
that children may not be sent by parcel post.
radio_rob_nj
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 12:28 am
What radios do you own?: Motorola, ICOM, Harris, Tait

Re: MotoTrbo Vs. Astro

Post by radio_rob_nj »

OK, thanks. I didn't think astro was compatable, but I figured I'd ask. How about the Smartzone? I'll continue to look, but I haven't found a post that specifically answered that question.
I'll see your 4.1 and raise you a 7.13
User avatar
Wowbagger
Aeroflex
Posts: 1287
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 10:46 am

Re: MotoTrbo Vs. Astro

Post by Wowbagger »

Tom in D.C. wrote:The MotoTrbo is a CDMA digital
Wrong. MotoTRBO is a TDMA system (time domain multiple access) not CDMA (code domain multiple access) system.
Tom in D.C. wrote: radio that operates on two adjacent
6.25 kHz channels simultaneously.
Not quite right. MotoTRBO uses a single 12.5kHz wide channel, as opposed to some systems which do indeed use 2 slaved 6.25kHz channels.
Tom in D.C. wrote: It has nothing in common with
IMBE/P25 setups.
That part is correct.

You also failed to answer his question about Smartnet Type II. I'll do so now:

Smartnet is not compatible with MotoTRBO.
This is my opinion, not Aeroflex's.

I WILL NOT give you proprietary information. I make too much money to jeopardize my job.

I AM NOT the Service department: You want official info, manuals, service info, parts, calibration, etc., contact Aeroflex directly, please.
radio_rob_nj
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 12:28 am
What radios do you own?: Motorola, ICOM, Harris, Tait

Re: MotoTrbo Vs. Astro

Post by radio_rob_nj »

Thank you both very much. Guess I have to stick to the XTS/XTL series...Darn, they're so expen$$$$$ive!
I'll see your 4.1 and raise you a 7.13
User avatar
MotoFAN
Posts: 1054
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:46 am
What radios do you own?: Approx. 50: Moto & Kenwood

Re: MotoTrbo Vs. Astro

Post by MotoFAN »

Wowbagger wrote:(time domain multiple access)
Division, not Domain :)
I am biggest fan of XTS2500 and ASTRO Digital Saber.
User avatar
Wowbagger
Aeroflex
Posts: 1287
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 10:46 am

Re: MotoTrbo Vs. Astro

Post by Wowbagger »

MotoFAN wrote:
Wowbagger wrote:(time domain multiple access)
Division, not Domain :)
Sorry, wrong. Don't get your data from Wikipedia.

The proper terms are Frequency domain multiple access, Time domain multiple access, and Code domain multiple access - that's how we folks who actually design these systems refer to them.

For example:

http://books.google.com/books?id=eJGvpK ... &ct=result
This is my opinion, not Aeroflex's.

I WILL NOT give you proprietary information. I make too much money to jeopardize my job.

I AM NOT the Service department: You want official info, manuals, service info, parts, calibration, etc., contact Aeroflex directly, please.
User avatar
escomm
Queue Moderator
Posts: 5170
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 8:24 pm

Re: MotoTrbo Vs. Astro

Post by escomm »

Maybe Wowbagger will want to write to the TIA or EIA, the FCC, or Ericsson, since they all seem to think TDMA stands for Time Division Multiple Access. I'm sure they'll be thrilled to hear a book he found on Google proves they've been doing it wrong for the last 10 years.

Reference TIA/EIA-136, FCC Report & Order 05-62-A1 and any number of Ericsson's patents.
com501
Posts: 1088
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2001 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: Over 50 - All Motorola

Re: MotoTrbo Vs. Astro

Post by com501 »

MotoTrbo is 2-slot TDMA. Some of us would like to think it is the new P25 Phase II standard, however, no one has bribed anyone with a sufficient quantity of money yet. :lol:
User avatar
Wowbagger
Aeroflex
Posts: 1287
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 10:46 am

Re: MotoTrbo Vs. Astro

Post by Wowbagger »

com501 wrote:MotoTrbo is 2-slot TDMA. Some of us would like to think it is the new P25 Phase II standard, however, no one has bribed anyone with a sufficient quantity of money yet. :lol:
Nope: the protocol between MotoTRBO and the 2 slot TDMA that Moto is proposing as the next generation P25 are different (as are Moto's 2 slot P25 and what the TIA is considering as a 2 slot TDMA for P25).

Then there's the Kenwood/Icom standard.

It all means more work for me.
This is my opinion, not Aeroflex's.

I WILL NOT give you proprietary information. I make too much money to jeopardize my job.

I AM NOT the Service department: You want official info, manuals, service info, parts, calibration, etc., contact Aeroflex directly, please.
com501
Posts: 1088
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2001 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: Over 50 - All Motorola

Re: MotoTrbo Vs. Astro

Post by com501 »

And all this while, no matter what standard anyone proposes a)no one can agree on it, and b)they ALL sound like crap.

Why don't we go back to analog and be done with it? I am tired of all this digital crap.

Even my cell phone sounds worse than my old 3 watt mobile.

(and no one has mentioned yet how their TV is going to work when they live in a fringe area with snowy analog pictures once the conversion happens next year....!!)
Post Reply

Return to “MotoTRBO Portables and Mobiles (4xxx/6xxx) 1.0 Series Subscribers”