MotoTrbo Vs. Astro
Moderator: Queue Moderator
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 12:28 am
- What radios do you own?: Motorola, ICOM, Harris, Tait
MotoTrbo Vs. Astro
I know almost nothing about Mototrbo, so with that, can a MotoTrbo radio be used on a Type II trunking system (in analog or digital mode)? I assume that MotoTrbo is not compatible with Astro, but can you flash the radio/does the radio ship with the H38 Smartzone feature?
I'll see your 4.1 and raise you a 7.13
- Tom in D.C.
- Posts: 3859
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2001 4:00 pm
- What radios do you own?: Progreso soup can with CRT
Re: MotoTrbo Vs. Astro
The MotoTrbo is a CDMA digital radio that operates on two adjacent
6.25 kHz channels simultaneously. It has nothing in common with
IMBE/P25 setups. It is also specifically not recommended fby Motorola
for public service work. Do a search on this Board for more information
on the subject; there's a lot of it here.
6.25 kHz channels simultaneously. It has nothing in common with
IMBE/P25 setups. It is also specifically not recommended fby Motorola
for public service work. Do a search on this Board for more information
on the subject; there's a lot of it here.
Tom in D.C.
In 1920, the U.S. Post Office Department ruled
that children may not be sent by parcel post.
In 1920, the U.S. Post Office Department ruled
that children may not be sent by parcel post.
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 12:28 am
- What radios do you own?: Motorola, ICOM, Harris, Tait
Re: MotoTrbo Vs. Astro
OK, thanks. I didn't think astro was compatable, but I figured I'd ask. How about the Smartzone? I'll continue to look, but I haven't found a post that specifically answered that question.
I'll see your 4.1 and raise you a 7.13
Re: MotoTrbo Vs. Astro
Wrong. MotoTRBO is a TDMA system (time domain multiple access) not CDMA (code domain multiple access) system.Tom in D.C. wrote:The MotoTrbo is a CDMA digital
Not quite right. MotoTRBO uses a single 12.5kHz wide channel, as opposed to some systems which do indeed use 2 slaved 6.25kHz channels.Tom in D.C. wrote: radio that operates on two adjacent
6.25 kHz channels simultaneously.
That part is correct.Tom in D.C. wrote: It has nothing in common with
IMBE/P25 setups.
You also failed to answer his question about Smartnet Type II. I'll do so now:
Smartnet is not compatible with MotoTRBO.
This is my opinion, not Aeroflex's.
I WILL NOT give you proprietary information. I make too much money to jeopardize my job.
I AM NOT the Service department: You want official info, manuals, service info, parts, calibration, etc., contact Aeroflex directly, please.
I WILL NOT give you proprietary information. I make too much money to jeopardize my job.
I AM NOT the Service department: You want official info, manuals, service info, parts, calibration, etc., contact Aeroflex directly, please.
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 12:28 am
- What radios do you own?: Motorola, ICOM, Harris, Tait
Re: MotoTrbo Vs. Astro
Thank you both very much. Guess I have to stick to the XTS/XTL series...Darn, they're so expen$$$$$ive!
I'll see your 4.1 and raise you a 7.13
- MotoFAN
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:46 am
- What radios do you own?: Approx. 50: Moto & Kenwood
Re: MotoTrbo Vs. Astro
Division, not Domain :)Wowbagger wrote:(time domain multiple access)
I am biggest fan of XTS2500 and ASTRO Digital Saber.
Re: MotoTrbo Vs. Astro
Sorry, wrong. Don't get your data from Wikipedia.MotoFAN wrote:Division, not DomainWowbagger wrote:(time domain multiple access)
The proper terms are Frequency domain multiple access, Time domain multiple access, and Code domain multiple access - that's how we folks who actually design these systems refer to them.
For example:
http://books.google.com/books?id=eJGvpK ... &ct=result
This is my opinion, not Aeroflex's.
I WILL NOT give you proprietary information. I make too much money to jeopardize my job.
I AM NOT the Service department: You want official info, manuals, service info, parts, calibration, etc., contact Aeroflex directly, please.
I WILL NOT give you proprietary information. I make too much money to jeopardize my job.
I AM NOT the Service department: You want official info, manuals, service info, parts, calibration, etc., contact Aeroflex directly, please.
Re: MotoTrbo Vs. Astro
Maybe Wowbagger will want to write to the TIA or EIA, the FCC, or Ericsson, since they all seem to think TDMA stands for Time Division Multiple Access. I'm sure they'll be thrilled to hear a book he found on Google proves they've been doing it wrong for the last 10 years.
Reference TIA/EIA-136, FCC Report & Order 05-62-A1 and any number of Ericsson's patents.
Reference TIA/EIA-136, FCC Report & Order 05-62-A1 and any number of Ericsson's patents.
Re: MotoTrbo Vs. Astro
MotoTrbo is 2-slot TDMA. Some of us would like to think it is the new P25 Phase II standard, however, no one has bribed anyone with a sufficient quantity of money yet.
Re: MotoTrbo Vs. Astro
Nope: the protocol between MotoTRBO and the 2 slot TDMA that Moto is proposing as the next generation P25 are different (as are Moto's 2 slot P25 and what the TIA is considering as a 2 slot TDMA for P25).com501 wrote:MotoTrbo is 2-slot TDMA. Some of us would like to think it is the new P25 Phase II standard, however, no one has bribed anyone with a sufficient quantity of money yet.
Then there's the Kenwood/Icom standard.
It all means more work for me.
This is my opinion, not Aeroflex's.
I WILL NOT give you proprietary information. I make too much money to jeopardize my job.
I AM NOT the Service department: You want official info, manuals, service info, parts, calibration, etc., contact Aeroflex directly, please.
I WILL NOT give you proprietary information. I make too much money to jeopardize my job.
I AM NOT the Service department: You want official info, manuals, service info, parts, calibration, etc., contact Aeroflex directly, please.
Re: MotoTrbo Vs. Astro
And all this while, no matter what standard anyone proposes a)no one can agree on it, and b)they ALL sound like crap.
Why don't we go back to analog and be done with it? I am tired of all this digital crap.
Even my cell phone sounds worse than my old 3 watt mobile.
(and no one has mentioned yet how their TV is going to work when they live in a fringe area with snowy analog pictures once the conversion happens next year....!!)
Why don't we go back to analog and be done with it? I am tired of all this digital crap.
Even my cell phone sounds worse than my old 3 watt mobile.
(and no one has mentioned yet how their TV is going to work when they live in a fringe area with snowy analog pictures once the conversion happens next year....!!)