ifr1900 Mot. R2660D Which one is better for ham?

This forum exists for the purposes for discussing service monitors (This includes but is not limited to Motorola, HP, Aeroflex, GD, etc). Additional topics allowed include test procedures, interpretation of test results, where to find information about specific tests, antenna VSWR, return loss testing, duplexer and filter alignment, etc.

Moderator: Queue Moderator

Post Reply
lau190
New User
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 3:12 am

ifr1900 Mot. R2660D Which one is better for ham?

Post by lau190 »

which one is better for ham radio?
DJP126
Posts: 873
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 6:41 am
What radios do you own?: What's a radio?

Re: ifr1900 Mot. R2660D Which one is better for ham?

Post by DJP126 »

Can't really answer your question because I'm not familiar with the IFR's capabilities, but why the 2660? The R2600D (without the iDen option and its' additional cost) would be fine for most ham work, or go to the R2670 for digital capabilities and options.
Dave
User avatar
n7maq
Posts: 1440
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2001 4:00 pm
What radios do you own?: Mocom 70 w/scan!!

Re: ifr1900 Mot. R2660D Which one is better for ham?

Post by n7maq »

I would go for the 2660, I have a 2660C (also a 3920 at work, so I do like IFR) and it works great for me.
tvsjr
Posts: 4118
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 9:46 am

Re: ifr1900 Mot. R2660D Which one is better for ham?

Post by tvsjr »

1900, hands down. I had a 2660... it was counterintuitive to operate, and the in-built 5MHz sawtooth pattern in the tracking generator completely sucks (and is supposedly a design "feature" as a marker).

I don't really like the 1600/1900 UI, either. My personal favorite in the current "cheap" service monitor realm is the HP 8920/8921.
Post Reply

Return to “Test Equipment & RF Equipment Alignment”